EC vs SC Formulation: 3 Key Differences You Need to Know

EC and SC Formulations

EC vs SC formulation is a common comparison in modern chemical formulation design, particularly across agrochemicals, personal care, and industrial applications. Emulsifiable Concentrates (EC) and Suspension Concentrates (SC) differ in composition, performance, and environmental impact, making the choice between them critical for formulation efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Understanding the difference between SC and EC formulation helps manufacturers select the right system based on solubility, stability, sustainability, and end-use requirements.

What are EC Formulation and SC Formulation?

EC formulation (Emulsifiable Concentrate) is a liquid formulation where the active ingredient is dissolved in an organic solvent along with emulsifiers, allowing it to form an emulsion when mixed with water.

SC formulation (Suspension Concentrate) is a water-based formulation where finely milled solid particles of the active ingredient are suspended using stabilizers and dispersants.

This basic distinction explains why EC vs SC formulations behave differently in terms of safety, stability, and environmental impact.

1. EC vs SC Formulation: Sustainability Differences

Sustainability is no longer an option; it’s a priority. EC and SC formulations have evolved to meet the expectations of both environmentally conscious consumers and international regulations. Here are key points about how these formulations promote sustainability:

  • Lower Environmental Impact: SC formulations, being water-based rather than solvent-based, significantly reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC), which can contribute to air pollution.
  • Efficient Use of Natural Resources: Both formulations enable efficient delivery of active ingredients in low concentrations, maximizing efficacy and minimizing waste.
  • Biodegradable Ingredients: Manufacturers are increasingly opting for biodegradable surfactants and emulsifiers in EC and SC formulations, ensuring that products are safer for the environment.

The difference between SC and EC formulation becomes clearer when comparing their base composition, environmental impact, and application behavior side by side.

Feature

EC Formulation

SC Formulation

Base 

Organic solvent 

Water 

VOC Emissions 

High 

Low 

Biodegradable Ingredients 

Growing usage 

Growing usage 

Overall Environmental Impact 

Higher 

Lower 

This shows how SC formulations, in particular, are paving the way for the development of more environmentally friendly products.

2. Difference Between SC and EC Formulation in Active Delivery

The ability to effectively deliver active ingredients is crucial in personal care products, as it ensures desired results, from hydration to UV protection. Here’s where EC and SC formulations shine:

EC Formulations (Emulsifiable Concentrates): 

  • Ideal for lipophilic ingredients. 
  • Facilitate uniform and effective skin penetration. 
  • Provide thermal and chemical stability, extending the product’s shelf life. 

SC Formulations (Suspension Concentrates):  

  • Perfect for water-insoluble ingredients, like pigments or mineral sunscreens. 
  • Allow for finely suspended particles, improving application dispersion. 
  • Reduce potential irritation associated with some active ingredients. 

Key Benefits of Efficient Delivery: 

  • Improves bioavailability of active ingredients. 
  • Increases stability during storage. 
  • Reduces the need for preservatives due to suspension technology. 
  • An efficient formulation not only adds value for consumers but also optimizes production costs by maximizing ingredient use. 

3. EC vs SC Formulation: Applications and Market Trends

The personal care industry is entering an era of mass personalization. Consumers seek products tailored to their specific needs, and EC and SC formulations offer the flexibility necessary to meet these demands. 

Current Trends: 

  1. Customized Textures: SC formulations enable the development of lightweight, fast-absorbing products ideal for warm climates and oily skin. Meanwhile, EC formulations are preferred for richer, more hydrating textures. 
  2. Compatibility with Sensitive Skin: With their low solvent content, SC formulations are particularly useful in products for reactive or sensitive skin. 
  3. Sustainability as a Purchasing Decision: Consumers are actively choosing products that align with their environmental values, encouraging the development of sustainable solutions. 

Examples of Innovations: 

  • Sunscreens with SC formulations offering uniform coverage without white residue. 
  • Facial care oils in EC format that maximize hydration without a greasy feel. 

Table of Common Uses:

Formulation 

Product Applications 

Key Benefit 

EC (Emulsifiable) 

Rich creams, facial oils 

Intensive hydration 

SC (Suspension) 

Sunscreens, lightweight lotions 

Uniform and light coverage 

Also Check: How to Select the Right Surfactant System for Agrochemical Formulations

How to Adapt to These Trends 

To stay competitive, manufacturers should: 

  • Explore new ingredient combinations aligned with market preferences. 
  • Adopt technologies that facilitate cleaner and more sustainable formulations. 
  • Implement marketing strategies that highlight these innovative qualities. 

Conclusion: 

Choosing between EC and SC formulation is not a one-size-fits-all decision. Each system offers distinct advantages depending on the nature of the active ingredient, application method, safety considerations, and regulatory requirements. Understanding the difference between SC and EC formulation allows formulators and manufacturers to balance performance, stability, and environmental impact more effectively.

EC formulations have traditionally been valued for their strong solvency and ease of formulation, particularly for actives with low water solubility. However, growing regulatory pressure and sustainability goals have increased the adoption of SC formulations, which offer water-based systems with reduced solvent content and improved safety profiles. As industries move toward more responsible chemical solutions, SC formulation continues to gain relevance across agrochemical and industrial applications.

In this evolving landscape, companies such as SBR International GmbH support formulators by providing technical expertise and formulation components that align with modern performance and compliance standards. By enabling informed formulation choices, SBR International contributes to the development of efficient, reliable, and more sustainable EC and SC systems.

A clear understanding of EC vs SC formulation empowers manufacturers to select the most appropriate approach for their specific use cases, ensuring product effectiveness while meeting environmental and regulatory expectations.

We hope this article is of great value to you.  

Contact us at info@sbr-int.com 

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between SC and EC formulation?

The main difference between SC and EC formulation lies in their base system. EC formulations use organic solvents, while SC formulations are water-based with suspended solid particles.

Which is better: EC or SC formulation?

Neither is universally better. EC vs SC formulation choice depends on application needs, safety requirements, environmental regulations, and active ingredient properties.

Where is SC formulation commonly used?

SC formulation is widely used where reduced solvent exposure, lower VOC emissions, and improved safety profiles are required.

Why are SC formulations considered more sustainable than EC?

SC formulations are water-based and generally produce lower VOC emissions, making them more environmentally friendly than traditional EC formulations.
Scroll to Top

Request Sample Form

Request Quote Form